MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001613820 · doi:10.1039/c2dt30781b

Tantallaaziridines: from synthesis to catalytic applications

2012· article· en· W2001613820 on OpenAlexaff
Jean Michel P. Lauzon, Laurel L. Schafer

Bibliographic record

VenueDalton Transactions · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalysisChemistryMoleculeCombinatorial chemistryLigand (biochemistry)AlkylationGroup 2 organometallic chemistryHydrogen atom abstractionQuenching (fluorescence)HydrogenOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tantallaaziridines are a class of organometallic compounds containing three-membered rings that include a tantalum, carbon and nitrogen atom. Closely related complexes containing the related iminoacyl ligand can be used as starting materials for tantallaaziridine synthesis. Tantallaaziridines can also be synthesized by reduction of imines or β-hydrogen abstraction of amides to give stable, isolable complexes. Tantallaaziridines possess a reactive Ta-C bond that can undergo stoichiometric transformations with unsaturated organic molecules to give new organometallic products. Upon quenching of such reactions with aqueous workup, selectively substituted small molecule amines can be prepared. Tantallaaziridines have also been proposed as catalytic intermediates in the direct α-alkylation of amines, hydroaminoalkylation, by exploiting the β-hydrogen abstraction route to regenerate the catalytically active species. Recent progress and remaining challenges in the field will be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalton TransactionsSame topicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207