MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001624780 · doi:10.1364/ofc.2015.m2g.5

Impact of MAP Detection on the Mutual Information of a 1.2 Tb/s Three-Carrier DP 16-QAM Superchannel

2015· article· en· W2001624780 on OpenAlexaff
A. Rezania, Aazar S. Kashi, John C. Cartledge

Bibliographic record

VenueOptical Fiber Communication Conference · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadrature amplitude modulationQAMMutual informationComputer scienceElectronic engineeringDistortion (music)SIGNAL (programming language)A priori and a posterioriTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringBandwidth (computing)Bit error rateDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a 1.206 Tb/s three-carrier DP 16-QAM superchannel, the mutual information is evaluated without and with fixed look-up table based maximum-a-posteriori detection at the receiver to mitigate pattern-dependent distortion in the transmitted signal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptical Fiber Communication ConferenceSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207