MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001632840 · doi:10.1081/drt-200063508

Study of the Drying Kinetics in Thin Layer: Fixed and Moving Bed

2005· article· en· W2001632840 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrying Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Drying and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermal diffusivityThin layerEstimatorKineticsDiffusionStatisticsMathematicsLayer (electronics)EconometricsOperations researchChemistryMaterials scienceThermodynamicsNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Drying kinetics of soybean seeds were investigated in the fixed bed (which is normally used) and in the moving bed with cross flow, both being run under thin-layer conditions. The analysis of the available data followed the diffusive model approach with re-parameterization. Special attention has been given to the nonlinearity inherent in the database in order to evaluate the statistical properties of the least squares estimator. The results showed that the effective diffusivity of the moving bed is 24 to 44% higher than that of the fixed bed. Keywords: Thin LayerMoving bedFixed bed ACKNOWLEDGMENT We thank the Research and Project Financer (PRONEX/CNPq), National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), and Organization to the Improvement of Higher Learning Personnel (CAPES) for their financial aid. Notes . .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it