Unimaginable Fine Communities: Identities in Traffic in Rukhsana Ahmad’s <i>Black Shalwar</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In March 1999, ten months after the nuclear testing in India and Pakistan and two months before the Kargil conflict poised the two nations at the brink of a nuclear war, Kali Theatre Company produced Black Shalwar. Rukhsana Ahmad’s dramatic adaptation of Saadat Hasan Manto’s short story, “Kali Shalwar,” opened at the Oval House Theatre in London on 4 March 1999. The play emerged at a global political moment that signalled the growing power of a virile, martial, and chauvinist brand of nationalism in the Indian subcontinent. It also signalled increasing violence against non-European minorities within the U.K. Black Shalwar, directed by Helena Uren, reflects upon interethnic love and betrayal at a historic juncture, marked by mounting aggression towards minorities in India as well as Britain. Ahmad explores how the porous bodies of prostitutes confound the ontological purities of ethnic identities and allow the co-mingling of religious differences. The ambivalent sense of betrayal that pervades the inter-ethnic relationship in Black Shalwar allegorizes the treatment of minorities and the crisis of secularism and multiculturalism in both the Indian subcontinent and England.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.056 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".