Effect of Chronic Psychogenic Stress Exposure on Enkephalin Neuronal Activity and Expression in the Rat Hypothalamic Paraventricular Nucleus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study tested the hypothesis that the activation pattern of enkephalinergic (ENKergic) neurons within the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVH) in response to psychogenic stress is identical whether in response to repeated exposure to the same stress (homotypic; immobilization) or to a novel stress (heterotypic; air jet puff). Rats were assigned to either acute or chronic immobilization stress paradigms (90 min/day for 1 or 10 days, respectively). The chronic group was then subjected to an additional 90-min session of either heterotypic or homotypic stress. A single 90-min stress session (immobilization or air jet) increased PVH-ENK heteronuclear (hn) RNA expression. In chronically stressed rats, exposure to an additional stress session (whether homotypic or heterotypic) continued to stimulate ENK hnRNA expression. Acute immobilization caused a marked increase in the numbers of Fos-immunoreactive and Fos-ENK double-labeled cells in the dorsal and ventral medial parvicellular, and lateral parvicellular subdivisions of the PVH. Chronic immobilization caused an attenuated Fos response ( approximately 66%) to subsequent immobilization. In contrast, chronic immobilization did not impair ENKergic neuron activation within the PVH following homotypic or heterotypic stress. These results indicate that within the PVH, chronic psychogenic stress markedly attenuates the Fos response, whereas ENKergic neurons resist habituation, principally within the ventral neuroendocrine portion of the nucleus. This suggests an increase in ENK effect during chronic stress exposure. Homotypic (immobilization) and heterotypic (air jet) psychogenic stressors produce similar responses, including Fos, ENK-Fos, and ENK hnRNA, within each subdivision of the PVH, suggesting similar processing for painless neurogenic stimuli.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".