MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract PD03-05: Analysis of tumour cell signaling in response to neoadjuvant metformin in women with early stage breast cancer.

2012· article· en· W2001683921 on OpenAlexaff
RJO Dowling, Saroj Niraula, MC Chang, SJ Done, Marguerite Ennis, Nicky Hood, DR McCready, WL Leong, JM Escallon, Michael Reedijk, PJ Goodwin, Vuk Stambolic

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkMount Sinai HospitalStatistics CanadaOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetforminMedicineHyperinsulinemiaBreast cancerPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayInsulinAMPKInternal medicineCancerOncologyDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyInsulin resistanceSignal transductionProtein kinase ABiologyPhosphorylation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The anti-diabetic drug metformin, commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes due to its ability to reduce circulating glucose and insulin, has emerged as a potential anti-cancer agent. Observational studies have reported decreased cancer incidence and mortality in diabetics receiving metformin. Metformin's ability to reduce insulin may be particularly important for breast cancer (BC) because hyperinsulinemia is an adverse prognostic factor and most cells express the insulin receptor (IR). The anti-cancer effects of metformin are associated with both direct (insulin-independent) and indirect (insulin-dependent) actions. Direct effects are linked to activation of AMPK and an inhibition of mTOR signalling, while indirect effects are mediated by reductions in circulating insulin levels, leading to reduced IR-activated PI3K signalling. We conducted a neoadjuvant, single arm, “window of opportunity” trial examining the clinical and biological effects of metformin on thirty-nine locoregional BC patients awaiting definitive surgery. Methods: Non-diabetic women with newly diagnosed, untreated BC were given metformin 500 mg tid for ≥2 weeks post diagnostic core biopsy until surgery. Fasting blood and tumour samples were collected at diagnosis and surgery. Blood glucose and insulin were assayed to assess the physiologic effects of metformin, while IHC analysis of tumours was used to characterize cellular markers before and after metformin. Specifically, IR levels and the phosphorylation status of proteins involved in AMPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling, including AMPK (T172) and AKT (S473), were examined. Results: 39 patients with a mean age of 51 years received metformin for a median of 18 days (range 13–40) with minor GI toxicities. The clinical effects (previously reported) included significant (p < 0.05) decreases in body mass index (−0.5 kg/m2), weight (−1.2 kg), glucose (−0.14 mM) and HOMA (an estimate of insulin resistance, −0.21), and a decrease in insulin (−4.7 pmol/L) that approached significance (p = 0.0686). Ki67 staining in tumour tissue decreased significantly and TUNEL increased significantly. Levels of IR expression decreased significantly (from 4.39 to 3.82, p = 0.0375) as did the phosphorylation status of AKT (S473) and AMPK (T172) (from 9.82 to 7.08, p = <0.0001; from 6.2 to 5.1, p = 0.0034, respectively). Conclusions: Metformin impact was consistent with beneficial anti-cancer effects. Reduced AKT phosphorylation, coupled with decreased insulin and IR levels, suggest insulin-dependent effects are important in the clinical setting. Assessment of additional factors in BC cells, including OCT1 expression (required for metformin uptake), and the phosphorylation of ACC (a marker of AMPK activation), is underway and will be reported. Integrated analysis of these factors combined with the physiological and molecular data described above will further enhance understanding of metformin action in the clinical setting. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD03-05.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicMetabolism, Diabetes, and CancerFrench-language works237,207