MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transient Analysis of Plane Wave Reflection from a Lorentz Half Space

2011· article· en· W2001709562 on OpenAlex
Qing Sheng Zeng, G.Y. Delisle

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLorentz transformationLaplace transformTransient (computer programming)CorrectnessInversion (geology)Reflection (computer programming)Time domainAlgorithmSimple (philosophy)Plane waveOpticsMathematical analysisMathematicsPhysicsComputer scienceClassical mechanicsGeologyComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A time domain technique based on numerical inversion of Laplace transform is extended and applied to transient analysis of pulses reflected from a Lorentz half space both for TE and TM cases. Its correctness and effectiveness are validated by comparing our results with those published in the literature. With this technique, the TM case when the incident angle is equal to 45 0 does not need to be processed separately and can be treated as a general case for any incident angle. This technique brings good accuracy in both late and early time, a simple algorithm, short calculation time, small required memory size and readily controlled error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it