MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001723540 · doi:10.5539/jfr.v1n3p101

Inactivation of Baroduric Bacteria Isolated by High Hydrostatic Pressure from Pickled Cowpea

2012· article· en· W2001723540 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Inactivation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBacteriaHydrostatic pressureBacillus pumilusFermentationFood scienceBiologyChemistryMolecular biologyMicrobiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>In this study, <em>Pickled Cowpea</em>, a typical lactic acid fermented vegetable in Sichuan, China, was used as samples to study both species and inactivation of baroduric bacteria isolated by HHP treatment under different pressure levels and different pressure holding time. 16S rDNA gene sequence, amplified using genomic DNA of 4 baroduric bacteria from <em>Pickled Cowpea</em> as templates, were sequenced and then were identified based on the sequence similarity and homology analysis, as <em>B. licheniformis</em>, <em>B</em>. <em>subtilis, B</em>. <em>sonorensis and B</em>. <em>pumilus</em>. The pressure resistance of the 4 strains are compared under pressure from 300 to 500 MPa with holding time from 3 to 25 min. <em>B</em>. <em>pumilus </em>which has higher pressure resistance can be selected as indicator bacteria for applying HHP treatment to <em>Pickle </em>production.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it