MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001731626 · doi:10.1111/1756-185x.12647

Which is worse in psoriasis - skin or joints?

2015· editorial· en· W2001731626 on OpenAlexaff
Aman Sharma, Debashish Danda, Vinod Chandran

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Rheumatic Diseases · 2015
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDermatology Life Quality IndexQuality of life (healthcare)Psoriatic arthritisPsoriasisEmbarrassmentDiseasePopulationPhysical therapyClinical psychologyInternal medicineDermatologyPsychologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Psoriasis (PsO) is a common disorder with its prevalence ranging from 1.5–3.0% among European and Scandinavian countries to just 0.15% in Chinese studies. Among those individuals with PsO, at least 10% are expected to have psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Both PsO and PsA impact on social, physical and psychological function, resulting in impairment of quality of life (QoL). This can be measured by a generic instruments such as Medical Outcomes Survey – Short Form 36 (SF36) or disease-specific QoL measures such as the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) as well as the PsAQoL assessment tool. SF36 has been validated and found reliable and responsive to change both in PsO and PsA.1, 2 The DLQI was developed and validated among PsO patients, and it is also responsive to change.3 PsAQoL, a 20-item questionnaire provides information about disease state; it is sensitive to change following therapy.4 It has also been translated and validated in various languages. Generic QoL measures such as SF36 have the additional strength and utility of allowing comparison of QoL in patients with other diseases in normal population.5 PsO results in debilitating psychiatric morbidity, stigmatization, embarrassment and impaired self-esteem.6-8 Female gender, duration of disease and treatment type has been shown to correlate with a poorer QoL.9 A systematic review of 17 studies showed that patients with PsO reported physical discomfort, impaired emotional functioning, negative body and self-image, limitations in daily activities, reduced social contacts, fewer activities involving skin exposure and reduced work.10 As the severity of PsO increases, so does the financial impact by way of health costs and impaired earnings, leading to impairment in global QoL.11 As a chronic psychological and physical disorder, it has been proposed that a measure of the cumulative QoL burden may have more utility. ‘Cumulative life course impairment’ considers overall physical, psychological and social damage while coping with psoriasis over a patient's lifetime.12 In support of this, it has been shown that life-time DLQI is a better predictor of patient outcomes related to weight, discrimination and depression than last-week DLQI.13 PsO has also been shown to be associated with symptoms of emotional distress, especially insomnia and general anxiety.14 Fortunately a number of therapies for PsO have also shown positive changes in QoL measures. Notably, biological therapies for PsO have been shown to result in better mental health than other systemic and topical treatments.15 PsA is a multifaceted disease, presenting with arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin and nail involvement. All of these manifestations have the potential to affect the assessment of QoL, thus confounding the assessment of QoL in these patients. Sleep disturbances have been reported in patients with PsO and PsA. Sleep disturbance was shown to be associated with generalized pain, anxiety, enthesitis and levels of C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in patients with PsA.16 It has been shown that health-related QoL in patients with inflammatory arthritides, including PsA, improves with newer therapies like anti-tumor necrosis factor agents,17 and it has also been shown to worsen on withdrawal of therapy.18 While one study in 2012 showed greater impairment of QoL in PsA as compared to PsO,19 Tezel et al.20 in this issue of the Journal report a similar PsAQoL in both their groups, although the patients with PsA had worse functional state than those with PsO alone. As discussed by the authors in the current paper, their patients with PsO and PsA, on average, had similar degrees of skin disease. This may explain the similar impairment of QoL when measured by the PsAQoL instrument which otherwise seems to reflect predominantly the cutaneous facet rather than the arthritic facet of PsA. In spite of the modest sample size as a weakness of this study, the findings provide relevant information. In fact, survey data collected by the National Psoriasis Foundation, USA, from 2003 to 2011 also have shown significant impairment of QoL and work productivity in PsO.21 In that survey, 52.3% of patients with PsO and 45.5% of patients with PsA were dissatisfied with their treatment, thus highlighting significant impairment of QoL. In the current study as well, QoL was significantly impaired in both PsO and PsA as compared to controls. These observations emphasize the need for advocacy and education, so that these patients have access to effective treatment options.22 In conclusion, PsO alone leads to a poor QoL comparable to that in PsA, one of the most debilitating arthropathies. With the currently available highly effective treatment options like biologics and synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, neither PsO nor PsA should go unnoticed and, as a consequence, left untreated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Rheumatic DiseasesSame topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207