MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001733342 · doi:10.1139/p02-077

Ar <i>K</i> X-ray production in slow, highly charged Ar <sup><i>q</i>+</sup>(<i>q</i> = 818) + Ar collisions

2002· article· en· W2001733342 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
H. Tawara, Patrick Richard

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBasic Energy SciencesOffice of Science
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsIonExcited stateL-shellElectron captureAtom (system on chip)ProjectileCharge (physics)Range (aeronautics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present work, mechanisms of Ar K X-ray production have been investigated under low-energy Ar q+ + Ar collisions in a wide range of the ion-charge states. Ar K X-rays have been observed as a function of the collision energy over (0.75–3.75)q keV/u and of the charge state over q = 8–16 of projectile Ar q+ ions. If the L-shell vacancies become available (q = 9), Ar K X-ray yields are found to be enhanced roughly three orders of magnitude, compared with Ar 8+ ions with no L-shell vacancy; to show some threshold; and to tend to quickly saturate at higher collision energies. The present analysis, based on the energy correlation diagrams of the quasi-molecules, suggests that Ar K X-rays originate entirely from target Ar atoms through promotion via the rotational coupling between 2pσ –2pπ molecular orbitals. Furthermore, the observed cross sections are found to increase nonlinearly with the projectile Ar q+ ion charge q (q = 9). This can be understood because of the combined effects of two contributions: (i) the increased number of the L-shell vacancies of projectile Ar q+ ions and (ii) the enhanced fluorescence yields of target Ar atom. In addition, Ar K X-rays have been observed under 2.5q keV/u Ar 17+ and Ar 18+ + Ar collisions and found to originate from the decay of K-shell vacancies initially present in the projectile Ar ions through electron capture into their highly excited states, followed by cascade down to the ground states. For the first time, though very weak, the X-rays due to the two-electron–one-photon transition, namely, K αα lines, have also been observed in bare Ar 18+ ion collisions. PACS Nos.: 34.70+e, 32.80Rm

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisFrench-language works237,207