MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001762419 · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.32022

Amidine surface modification of poly(acrylonitrile‐<i>co</i>‐vinyl chloride) reduces platelet adhesion

2008· article· en· W2001762419 on OpenAlexaff
Evelyn K. F. Yim, Michael V. Sefton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Surface Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsAmidinePolymer chemistrySurface modificationMaterials scienceAcrylonitrileNitrileBenzamidineChemical modificationNuclear chemistryChemistryPolymerOrganic chemistryCopolymerComposite materialPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The surface nitrile groups of solvent-cast polyacrylonitrile-co-vinyl chloride (PAN-VC) films were converted into amidine groups through a two-step process analogous to Pinner's method of 1877. The amidine groups were hypothesized to reduce platelet adhesion and activation through the inhibition of the classical complement pathway, as was noted for benzamidine and pentamidine in earlier studies. A slightly higher nitrogen content was detected on the amidine-surface modified (ASM) samples by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy relative to the solvent-treated and unmodified controls. Reaction with pentafluoroaldehyde resulted in increased fluorine and decreased nitrogen contents (relative), consistent with the formation of a Schiff base with the primary nitrogen of the amidine on ASM PAN-VC surface. The corresponding yield was 17.2% based on nitrile groups and 9.6% based on all repeating units of the base polymer. Despite this low degree of amidine modification, platelet adhesion was approximately 40% lower on the amidine-modified film compared to the solvent-treated and unmodified controls. The scanning electron micrographs also showed less activation in the adherent platelets. A small reduction in C1s binding was also noted on the amidine-modified surface. Taken together, these results support the notion that amidine modification may be a useful approach to improve the nonthrombogenicity of a biomaterial. However, much effort is required to improve the degree of surface modification and to provide unequivocal evidence linking amidines to the improved thrombogenicity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part ASame topicPolymer Surface Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207