MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001777192 · doi:10.1109/icites.2012.6216645

An overview on web security threats and impact to e-commerce success

2012· article· en· W2001777192 on OpenAlexaff
Hatoon Matbouli, Qigang Gao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer securityE-commerceBusinessInternet privacySecurity through obscurityAffect (linguistics)Cloud computing securityComputer scienceSecurity information and event managementWorld Wide WebCloud computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

E-commerce has made great strides in providing a convenient, fast and secure shopping experience for consumers. However, there is still a significant portion of shoppers whose security fears impact how they spend their money online. Because of this, security issues associated with e-commerce and customer sites must be constantly reviewed and updated with appropriate countermeasures. As web security threats detrimentally affect the success of electronic consumerism, it is imperative to educate both consumers and businesses on the issues and how to eliminate or minimize the risks of security breaching in an e-commerce environment. This paper presents a survey and analysis on e-commerce related security issues, the impact to E-commerce success, and the available integrated security strategies. We attempt to offer a simple guide how to properly deal with the security threats that detrimentally affect e-commerce. In addition, this paper provides an analysis on the barriers that prevent many developing countries from adopting e-commerce. Some recommendations on how to overcome these problems will also be provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionFrench-language works237,207