Evolution of the early Paleozoic Cordilleran margin of Laurentia: tectonic and eustatic events interpreted from sequence stratigraphy and conodont community patterns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several field seasons in the Canadian Cordillera have allowed the measurement, description and sampling of over 20 000 m of lower Paleozoic strata from 26 stratigraphic sections across four platform-to-basin transects, with the recovery of over 100 000 conodonts from more than 1200 45 kg samples. This work was part of the Lithoprobe Slave Northern Cordillera Lithospheric Evolution (SNORCLE) project but is also being extended through a Pan-Lithoprobe project to understand the tectonic and eustatic response of much of the Laurentian plate through the early Paleozoic. Based on the abundant field data, the complex stratigraphic framework is interpreted in terms of sequence stratigraphy and a derived relative sea-level curve. Using detailed conodont taxonomic and biostratigraphic results, cluster analysis of conodont distributional data identified an evolving series of conodont communities through space and time. These communities were partitioned across the platform-to-basin gradient and provide an additional sensitive indicator of relative sea-level change. These two independent approaches generated comparable eustatic curves for this Cordilleran Laurentian margin during much of the early Paleozoic and identified some global eustatic events noted by earlier workers. This part of Laurentia was not a simple passive margin during the early Paleozoic, but rather was affected by four main tectonic events complicated by six principal eustatic changes. Some success was achieved in filtering the global and regional tectoniceustatic effects and in proposing causes for some of the events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".