Environmental complexity reduces tadpole predation by water bugs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We assessed the role of habitat structure in the outcome of predation by measuring how aquatic vegetation influences predation rates of water bugs (Belostoma oxyurum (Dufour, 1863), Hemiptera, Belostomatidae) on tadpoles of Dendropsophus minutus (Peters, 1872) and Scinax curicica Pugliese, Pombal, and Sazima, 2004 (Anura, Hylidae). Considering that previous studies have shown that some tadpole species preferentially use microhabitats with aquatic vegetation at sites in southeastern Brazil, we hypothesized that these tadpoles may select such complex microhabitats because they can offer some protection against co-occurring predatory aquatic insects. We used field enclosures containing tadpoles of D. minutus and S. curicica and one predator (B. oxyurum), placed on natural substrata in sites both with and without aquatic vegetation, according to treatment. We measured the combined effects of predation and habitat structure on the survivorship of tadpoles, monitoring each enclosure daily during 10 days to survey surviving tadpoles. Treatments with predators reduced tadpole survivorship significantly in relation to controls for both tadpole species. The interaction between predator and vegetation was also significant, predation rates being lower when vegetation was present.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it