Hydride complexes of ruthenium derived from the heterolytic activation of dihydrogen by amidophosphine complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reaction of 〚NPNH〛Ru(η 3 :η 2 -cyclooctadienyl) ( 1 ) (where 〚NPNH〛 = {PhNHSiMe 2 CH 2 P(Ph)CH 2 SiMe 2 NPh}), an organometallic mono-amide complex of ruthenium(II), with hydrogen gas (1–4 atm) generates three ruthenium hydride species: 〚NPNH〛RuH ( 2 ), 〚NPNH 2 〛RuH 2 (C 7 H 8 ) ( 3 ) and 〚NPNH 2 〛RuH 2 ( 4 ). All of these complexes result from hydrogenation of the cyclooctadienyl group; complexes 3 and 4 also undergo conversion of the amido linkage into a ruthenium hydride and an amine. Complexes 2 and 3 have been characterized both in solution by NMR spectroscopy and in the solid state by X-ray Diffraction and Infrared Spectroscopy. While 4 was fully characterized in solution by NMR spectroscopy, attempts to recrystallize this material yielded 2 ; the reaction of 2 with H 2 does not produce 4 . The starting complex 1 acts as a catalyst precursor for the hydrogenation of imines such as benzylidene aniline; however, none of the isolated hydride species 2 , 3 or 4 were active as catalyst precursors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".