MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Residents’ Traveling Track and Analysis Methods Based on Mobile Phone Data

2014· article· en· W2001808326 on OpenAlexaff
Pan Li, Ye Wen Gao, Ju Wei Wu, Xu Li, Bing Bing Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Transportation of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopularityTrack (disk drive)Mobile phoneBase stationPhoneTransport engineeringOrder (exchange)Computer scienceBase (topology)AdvertisingTelecommunicationsBusinessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To avoid traffic congestion’s becoming the obstruct of social and national economic development is the final goal that professionals in transportation field make great efforts to pursue. At the same time, with the increasing popularity of mobile phones, we can get a lot of phone base station data to identify the residents’ travelling track. Thus we can analyze the residents’ travelling behavior and get residents’ travelling patterns and mechanism. Also, residents’ travelling could be induced and guided in order that the condition of urban transport can be improved. Based on the above background, this paper is mainly based on mobile phone base station data and GIS data analysis method research on the urban transportation of residents’ travelling track.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.514
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisFrench-language works237,207