Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article est un essai critique qui tente de dégager une perspective d'analyse sociale nouvelle pour une problématique qui, elle, ne l'est pas. Les questions suivantes sont soulevées: Y a-t-il des rapports possibles entre la socialisation masculine, la culture sportive et la violence à l'égard des femmes Existe-t-il une jonction entre "masculinité et sport" et "masculinité et violence" envers les femmes» La socialisation andro centrique qui domine la culture sportive actuelle contribue-t-elle à la violence envers les femmes Cette recherche, subventionnée par le CRSH, espère démontrer que la culture sportive contribue à la naturaliser » la violence et, ce faisant, perpétue la violence faite aux femmes. Le défi consiste donc à construire une vision de l'inacceptabilité devant la culture sportive en tant que lieu d'apprentissage et de la légitimation de la violence masculine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".