Project meeting report: International Workshop on Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes among Indigenous Peoples in the Circumpolar North, August 31--September 1, 2000 Nuuk, Greenland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Medical researchers involved in autopsy and related studies among indigenous peoples of the circumpolar North met for a workshop in Nuuk, Greenland on August 31 – September 1, 2000 to repor t on current findings and discuss possible future studies. The meeting, held just prior to the NUNAMED conference, was sponsored by the Nordic Arctic Research Programme (NARP) and was organized and hosted at the Hotel Hans Egede by Drs. Peter Bjerrgaard, Gert Mulvad, and Henning Sloth Pedersen. Attending were investigators from Canada, Denmark, Faroe Islands, Greenland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, and the USA. Information on NARP is available at their website (http://thule.oulu.fi/narp/). (Int J Circumpolar Health 2002; 61(1):70-79)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".