MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001828466 · doi:10.1115/1.2709976

Use of Streamwise Periodic Boundary Conditions for Problems in Heat and Mass Transfer

2006· article· en· W2001828466 on OpenAlex
Steven Beale

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Heat Transfer · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsBoundary value problemRobin boundary conditionFinHeat transferHeat exchangerDifferent types of boundary conditions in fluid dynamicsNeumann boundary conditionThermodynamicsPhysicsMathematicsMathematical analysisMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fully developed periodic boundary conditions have frequently been employed to effect performance calculations for heat and mass exchange devices. In this paper a method is proposed, which is based on the use of primitive variables combined with the prescription of slip values. Either pressure difference or mass flow rate may be equivalently prescribed. Both constant wall temperature (Dirichlet) and constant heat flux (Neumann) conditions may be considered, as well as the intermediate linear (Robin) boundary condition. The example of an offset-fin plate-fin heat exchanger is used to illustrate the application of the procedure. The mathematical basis by which the method may be extended to the consideration of mass transfer problems with arbitrary boundary conditions, and associated continuity, momentum, and species sources and sinks is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it