MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001831180 · doi:10.1109/upinlbs.2014.7033704

Use of diversity techniques for weak GNSS signal tracking in fading environments

2014· article· en· W2001831180 on OpenAlexaff
Ranjeeth Kumar Siddakatte, Ali Broumandan, Gérard Lachapelle

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGNSS applicationsMultipath propagationPseudorangeComputer scienceAntenna diversityFadingElectronic engineeringSIGNAL (programming language)Antenna (radio)Multipath mitigationGlobal Positioning SystemReal-time computingTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research focuses on improving the GNSS signal measurement performance in harsh multipath environments. The nature of GNSS signal propagation in typical signal impeding wireless channels such as indoors and urban environments is studied. The signal power distribution, delay spread, and Doppler spread characteristics of real GNSS signals in such environments are investigated. Based on the observations obtained from this characterization, a closed-loop tracking architecture based on spatial diversity reception is proposed. The proposed algorithm is tested on real data collected using two antennas in indoor static and urban kinematic scenarios. The carrier loop tracking, code loop tracking, and pseudorange errors are compared between single antenna reception and dual antenna spatial diversity reception for different scenarios. Results show that the proposed tracking method improves the Doppler measurement by more than 50% and pseudorange measurements by 2–5 m compared to a single antenna receiver.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207