Complex order parameter phase-field models derived from structural phase-field-crystal models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phase-field-crystal (PFC) modeling paradigm is rapidly emerging as the model of choice when investigating materials phenomena with atomistic scale effects over diffusive time scales. Recent variants of the PFC model, so-called structural PFC (XPFC) models introduced by Greenwood et al., have further increased the capability of the method by allowing for easy access to various structural transformations in pure materials [Greenwood, Provatas, and Rottler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 045702 (2010)] and binary alloys [Greenwood, Ofori-Opoku, Rottler, and Provatas, Phys. Rev. B 84, 064104 (2011)]. We present an amplitude expansion of these XPFC models, leading to a mesoscale complex order parameter, i.e., phase-field, model for two-dimensional square-triangular structures. Amplitude models retain the salient atomic scale features of the underlying PFC models, while resolving microstructures on mesoscales as traditional phase-field models. The applicability and capability of these complex-order parameter models is demonstrated with simulations of peritectic solidification and grain growth exhibiting the emergence of secondary phase structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it