MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001847554 · doi:10.1002/pssc.200881291

Dark current in multilayer stabilized amorphous selenium X‐ray photoconductors

2009· article· en· W2001847554 on OpenAlexafffund
J. Frey, George Belev, O. Tousignant, H. Mani, Safa Kasap

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDark currentX-ray detectorPhotoconductivityOptoelectronicsAmorphous solidMaterials scienceElectrodeDetectorParticle detectorAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Current (fluid)OpticsChemistryPhotodetectorPhysicsCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Commercially available flat panel, direct conversion, digital X‐ray image detectors use a photoconductive layer of stabilized amorphous selenium (a‐Se) sandwiched between two electrodes to convert incident X‐ray radiation into stored electrical charge. These detectors use thin n ‐like and p ‐like blocking layers to trap charge carriers injected from the contacts and thus reduce the dark current by limiting the rate of carrier injection. The effect of each of these blocking layers is determined by measuring the dark current in 200 μm thick mammographic detector‐like samples of a‐Se with three different structures: a single intrinsic layer and n‐i and i‐p double layers. Dark current is measured as a function of time over 20,000 s and as a function of applied electric field over the range of −10 V/μm to +10 V/μm. (© 2009 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physicsSame topicLuminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsFrench-language works237,207