MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001855518 · doi:10.3137/ao.410104

Evidence of change in the sea of okhotsk: Implications for the north pacific

2003· article· en· W2001855518 on OpenAlex
Katherine Hill, Andrew J. Weaver, Howard J. Freeland, Alexander Bychkov

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueATMOSPHERE-OCEAN · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOceanographyOutflowPacific oceanGeologyClimatologyPeriod (music)Environmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Russian data from five cruises during the period 1949 to 1952 are compared with observations taken during the World Ocean Circulation Experiment (WOCE) P1W in 1993 to examine changes which may have occurred in the Sea of Okhotsk during the latter half of the last century. A basin‐wide warming (0.1°‐0.3°C) and freshening (0.05–0.1 psu) of the Sea of Okhotsk was found to have occurred over the latter part of the 20th century. Since the Sea of Okhotsk is thought to be the major source for North Pacific Intermediate Water (NPIW), calculations were made to determine whether or not these changes in the Sea of Okhotsk water properties were consistent with evidence of large‐scale freshening of intermediate waters in the North Pacific. From several Okhotsk‐to‐Pacific salt flux calculations, we conclude that the Sea of Okhotsk was capable of causing the freshening noted in the NPIW over the past half century under certain assumed outflow conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it