MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

PREDICTORS OF LONG-TERM RENAL DYSFUNCTION AND CHRONIC DIALYSIS AFTER HEART TRANSPLANTATION

2004· article· en· W2001875861 on OpenAlexaff
M Edwardes, Nadia Giannetti, Renzo Cecere, Geneva Cantarovich

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRenal functionDialysisUrologyKidney diseaseTransplantationHeart transplantationOdds ratioBlood pressureCreatinineInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusCardiologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O338 Aim: To determine risk factors of renal dysfunction after heart transplantation (HTx). Methods: We reviewed 226 patients (pts) (189 men, 37 women, 51±10 yr-old) with HTx between July 1982 and August 2003 and who survived >1-mo. All the pts were on cyclosporine (CsA). Creatinine clearance (CrCl) was assessed with the Cockcroft-Gault formula. We evaluated sex, age, primary disease, diabetes, hypertension, ACE/ARB, CsA dose (mg/kg/day) and CsA trough levels at 1- and 3-mo. The data were recorded at baseline, 1-mo, 3-mo, 1-, 3-, 5-, 7-, 10-, 13-, 15-, 17- and 20-yrs post-HTx. Cox regression was done for time to chronic dialysis and for time until CrCl ≤30 ml/min ≥1-yr post-HTx. Results: The earliest time to chronic dialysis was 484 days. The strongest predictors of time to chronic dialysis were the drop in CrCl between 1-mo and 12-mo (Drop1-12), with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.35 per 10 ml/min of CrCl (95%CI (1.1-1.7), P=0.017, n=197, 13 events), or alternatively the drop in CrCl between 3-mo and 12-mo (Drop3-12), with OR 1.38 (95%CI (1.03-1.8), P=0.034). Both ORs are adjusted for systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 1-yr (SBP OR=1.44 per 10 mm Hg, P=0.031). The drop between 1-mo and 3-mo (Drop1-3) and pre-HTx CrCl, jointly predicted shorter time to CrCl ≤30 ml/min, with Drop1-3 OR 1.25 (95%CI (1.04-1.50), P=0.017; and pre-HTx CrCl OR 0.77 per 10 ml/min (95%CI (0.6-0.9), P=0.019 n=208, 23 events). Four factors jointly predict CrCl ≤30 ml/min at ≥3-yrs post-HTx: Drop1-12, with adjusted OR 1.23 (95%CI (1.0-1.5), P=0.045, n=197, 22 events), primary disease other than ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy, with OR 3.3 (95%CI (1.1-10.0), P=0.03, CrCl at 1-yr, with OR of 0.64 per 10 ml/min (95%CI (0.5-0.9), P=0.005), and SBP, with OR 1.33 per 10 mm Hg (95%CI (1.04-1.7), P=0.024). Conclusions: DROP1-12 and Drop3-12 are strong predictors for earlier time to chronic dialysis. Drop1-12 is also predictive of CrCl ≤30 ml/min at ≥3-yrs post-HTx, along with CrCl and SBP at 1-yr, and primary disease other than ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy. Finally, Drop1-3, along with baseline CrCl, predicts CrCl ≤30 ml/min at ≥1-yr post-HTx. These results suggest that future studies should focus on early kidney protection post-HTx.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantation→Same topicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→