MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001887693 · doi:10.1109/icmsao.2013.6552647

Generating maximal efficient faces for the multiobjective multicommodity flow problem

2013· article· en· W2001887693 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimization and Mathematical Programming
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdjacency listMathematical optimizationFlow (mathematics)Computer scienceFlow networkSpace (punctuation)MathematicsMulti-commodity flow problemMinimum-cost flow problemAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multicommodity flow problems (MCFPs) arise when several commodities are to be transmitted within a capacitated network. MCFP has received a great attention in the literature for the single objective case, while only few works addressed the problem in a multiobjective framework. In this paper, we study the MCFP with multiple objectives. This problem is modeled as multiobjective linear program with continuous decision variables. In order to solve this problem, we propose to apply an exact solution approach operating in the objective space, called the Efficient Solutions Adjacency based Method (ESAM) to generate all the maximal efficient faces and extreme points. An experimental study is conducted to test the efficiency of the ESAM on solving small and medium sized multiobjective MCFPs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it