Dietary n-3 fatty acids decrease the leukotriene B<sub>4</sub> response ex vivo and the bovine serum albumin-induced footpad swelling index in New Hampshire hens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of feeding New Hampshire hens different amounts of n-6 and n-3 fatty acids on plasma and immune tissue fatty acid profiles, leukotriene (LT) B4 response ex vivo in stimulated thrombocytes, serum non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentrations, and bovine serum albumen (BSA)-induced footpad swelling index were investigated. Seventy-two New Hampshire hens (n = 24/treatment) were fed diets supplemented with 3.0% sunflower oil (Diet I), 1.5% sunflower oil + 1.5% fish oil (Diet II), or 3.0% fish oil (Diet III). After 46 d on experimental diets, concentrations of C20:5n-3 and C22:6n-3 were higher in plasma, thrombocytes, and spleens of hens fed Diet II and III compared with hens fed Diet I (P ≤ 0.05). Thrombocytes from hens fed Diet III that were stimulated ex vivo with calcium ionophore A23187 produced less LTB4 than those from hens fed Diets I and II (P < 0.05). The serum NEFA concentrations were 0.31 ± 0.12, 0.25 ± 0.08, and 0.17 ± 0.06 mEq L-1 for hens fed Diets I, II, and III, respectively (P = 0.07). The cell-mediated immune response, based on results of a BSA-induced footpad swelling index at 48 h, was less in hens fed Diet III (P < 0.05) compared with hens fed Diets I or II. These results indicate that increasing the concentration of n-3 fatty acids in diets fed to New Hampshire hens might depress cell-mediated immunity and the pro-inflammatory LTB4 response. Key words: N-3 fatty acids; Leukotriene B4; Thrombocytes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".