A SIMPLE ALPHABET-INDEPENDENT FM-INDEX
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We design a succinct full-text index based on the idea of Huffman-compressing the text and then applying the Burrows-Wheeler transform over it. The resulting structure can be searched as an FM-index, with the benefit of removing the sharp dependence on the alphabet size, σ, present in that structure. On a text of length n with zero-order entropy H0, our index needs O(n(H0 + 1)) bits of space, without any significant dependence on σ. The average search time for a pattern of length m is O(m(H0 + 1)), under reasonable assumptions. Each position of a text occurrence can be located in worst case time O((H0 + 1) log n), while any text substring of length L can be retrieved in O((H0 + 1)L) average time in addition to the previous worst case time. Our index provides a relevant space/time tradeoff between existing succinct data structures, with the additional interest of being easy to implement. We also explore other coding variants alternative to Huffman and exploit their synchronization properties. Our experimental results on various types of texts show that our indexes are highly competitive in the space/time tradeoff map.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".