MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001930041 · doi:10.1021/la001338+

Picosecond Fluorescence Studies of the Surface Morphology of Charged Polystyrene Latex Particles

2001· article· en· W2001930041 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrostatics and Colloid Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolystyreneMorphology (biology)FluorescencePicosecondChemical engineeringMaterials scienceChemistryPolymer chemistryOpticsPolymerComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two negatively charged polystyrene latex dispersions with particles of similar diameter (around 100 nm) but different surface charge density (1.7 μC/cm 2 for CG18 and 2.3 μC/cm 2 for CG5) were compared in terms of their surface morphology. Since they were synthesized in the presence of a redox initiator (potassium persulfate/sodium metabisulfite), particles bore sulfate and sulfonate charged groups at the surface. Fluorescence decay measurements were performed in situ on these latex samples, using a pair of fluorescent cationic dyes adsorbed onto the surface: Rhodamine 6G (R6G) as the energy transfer donor and malachite green carbinol hydrochloride (MG) as the acceptor. Since the kinetics of the direct nonradiative energy transfer process between the dyes is sensitive to the donor and acceptor distributions, fluorescence decay measurements provide information about the binding distribution of the cationic dyes, which reflects the distribution of the negative charges at the latex particle surface. For the highly charged sample (CG5), we found a dye distribution reflecting an interface thickness with an average value of δ = 2.9 ± 0.2 nm. For the CG18 sample, having a lower surface charge density, a thinner dye distribution was evidenced, with an interface thickness δ = 2.0 ± 0.1 nm. The broadening of the distribution with the increase of surface charge density was interpreted in terms of the steric hindrance and the electrostatic repulsion between the charged polymer chain ends extending into the aqueous medium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it