MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001940177 · doi:10.7202/1006640ar

Un tournant de Vatican II

2011· article· fr· W2001940177 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Gilles Routhier

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes d histoire religieuse · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le 11 octobre 1962, un discours étonnant de Jean XXIII inaugure les travaux de Vatican II. Mais la surprise ne devait pas s’arrêter là. Très vite, les Pères vont s’écarter de l’ordre du jour prévu pour les travaux conciliaires. La demande de report des votes aux différentes commissions conciliaires, la discussion non-planifiée d’un Message à tous les hommes, le renvoi du De fontibus, autant d’événements qui ne correspondaient pas aux plans élaborés par la Curie en vue du Concile. Or, l’examen des documents permet de croire que le retournement du mois d’octobre se préparait déjà depuis le mois de mai, dans les grands évêchés de l’Europe centrale. En Amérique du Nord, seul Léger semble avoir activement participé à cette coalition qui a largement contribué à la réorientation de Vatican II.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0110.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes d histoire religieuseSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207