Generation, observation, and reactivity of furyl- and thienylketenes and bisketenes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
2- and 3-Furylketenes (18 and 20), 2- and 3-thienylketenes (19 and 21), and bis(2,5-ketenyl)thiophene (24) have been generated as observable reactive intermediates by photochemical Wolff rearrangements. Stabilization energies of the monoketenes 18–21 have been determined by DFT computations of isodesmic energy changes, and these ketenes are predicted to be modestly destabilized relative to phenylketene. Rate constants for reaction of 18–21 with H 2 O and with n-BuNH 2 have been measured and are similar to those of the 2-, 3-, and 4-pyridylketenes (1). The product of reaction of 2-furylketene (18) with H 2 O is calculated to be stable as an acid enol, and reaction of 18 with the stable free radical TEMPO forms a stable ester enol, consistent with stabilization by intramolecular H-bonding to the furyl oxygen. Bis(thienyl)-1,2-bisketenes 26 and 28 have been generated by photochemical cyclobutenedione ring opening and are highly reactive in ring closure. This is attributed to destabilization of the ketenes and stabilization of the cyclobutenediones by the electron donating aryl groups.Key words: ketenes, furans, thiophenes, reactive intermediates, photolysis, mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it