MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001987647 · doi:10.1515/pik-2012-0027

Smooth Resilient Service Provision in Large Heterogeneous Networks

2012· article· de· W2001987647 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kamill Panitzek, Muhammad Ikram, Max Mühlhäuser, Thorsten Strufe

Bibliographic record

VenuePIK - Praxis der Informationsverarbeitung und Kommunikation · 2012
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsComputer scienceHandoverService (business)Distributed computingComputer networkReplication (statistics)Code (set theory)Mobile deviceCellular networkPoint (geometry)Computer securityWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Article Smooth Resilient Service Provision in Large Heterogeneous Networks was published on August 1, 2012 in the journal PIK - Praxis der Informationsverarbeitung und Kommunikation (volume 35, issue 3).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePIK - Praxis der Informationsverarbeitung und KommunikationSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207