MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001988860 · doi:10.1139/l06-001

Discussion of "Explicit solutions of the Manning equation for partially filled circular pipes"

2006· article· en· W2001988860 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Willi H. Hager

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSanitary sewerFlow (mathematics)TurbulenceFlow conditionsMathematicsPotential flowMechanicsEnvironmental scienceGeometryPhysicsEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The discusser has read with interest the work on sewer design based on the Manning equation. Two distinctly different conditions have to be considered, namely the “full-flowing” and the “partially filled” sewer flows. According to European standards, a sewer should be designed based on the Colebrook and White equation for the full-flowing condition. The Manning equation is currently in use, however, for predicting the flow characteristics in the partially filled sewer flow regime. Stable flow in partially filled sewers The discusser conducted a study on the historical development and currently accepted design guidelines of the partially filled sewer flow (Hager 1991a, 1991b). Curves for relative discharge in terms of sewer filling have been in use since the 1880s, before Robert Manning (1816–1897) presented his equation. A large number of experimental studies on the flow of water in partially filled pipes were conducted in the 20th century based on deviations between the measurements in existing sewers and the results furnished by the Manning equation. Notable works were presented by Ackers (1961a, 1961b) and Sauerbrey (1969). The following conclusions were drawn by Hager (1991a, 1991b):  The full-flowing condition in sewers is an important notion in sewer design, although it may not occur in nature.  The characteristics of full-flowing sewers should be computed with the Colebrook and White equation, thereby accounting for the effects of Reynolds number and relative roughness.  The Manning equation approximates the previous relation in the turbulent rough flow regime; it may be useful for designing partially filled sewers.  The air flow close to the sewer top has a small effect on the water flow in a sewer.  Filling diagrams are limited towards the sewer top; flow above the filling limit is hydraulically unstable.  The transition from free surface to pressurized sewer flow is abrupt; the stable upper limit corresponds to the maximum free surface discharge condition.  The findings of Sauerbrey (1969) appear to account in the best way for the effective flow characteristics in circular, partially filled sewers. The author did not account for observations made with sewers; instead, he accepted the relations furnished by the Manning equation without recourse to previous investigations. When plotting the relative discharge Q/Qv versus the relative filling y = h/D (where Q is the discharge, Qv is the discharge for the full-flowing condition, h is the uniform flow depth, and D is the sewer diameter), the condition Q/Qv is attained twice, namely for y = 1 as required from the scalings and for y ≅ 0.85; the latter condition was identified as the full-flowing condition in practice because it furnishes a discharge identical to that of the condition y = 1, in the stable flow pattern. A sewer flow is unstable in the upper filling region, typically for 0.85 ≤ y ≤ 1. Therefore, this region was excluded in sewer design. Circular profile computations

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207