MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001990859 · doi:10.1121/1.4920336

Efficient geoacoustic inversion of spherical-wave reflection coefficients for muddy seabeds

2015· article· en· W2001990859 on OpenAlexaff
Jorge E. Quijano, Stan E. Dosso, Jan Dettmer, Charles W. Holland

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySeabedInversion (geology)Reflection coefficientReflection (computer programming)AcousticsComputationAttenuationComputer scienceSeismologyOpticsAlgorithmPhysicsOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents efficient geoacoustic inversion of high-resolution reflectivity data for a seabed site consisting of a thick mud layer (~10 m) over multi-layered sandy sediments. Wide-angle, broadband reflection-coefficient data were collected using a towed source and a recording hydrophone located a few meters above the seabed. Trans-dimensional Bayesian inversion is applied to estimate sound-speed, density, and attenuation profiles for an unknown number of sediment layers. Due to the experiment geometry, the data should be modeled as spherical-wave reflection coefficients, which require numerical integration of rapidly oscillating functions and can be computationally intensive. Here, a speed-up of two to three orders of magnitude is achieved by introducing a fast Levin-type numerical integration implemented on a graphics processing unit. The new fast integration algorithm/implementation alleviates time constraints for the spherical-wave inversion, which would otherwise require weeks of computation time, and precludes the use of fast but less-accurate plane-wave theory. Inversion results are presented for simulated data and for experimental data collected on the western Malta Plateau. The analysis of muddy sediments in this work is expected to provide insight into the geoacoustics of the New England mud patch, location of the upcoming ONR Seabed Characterization Experiment 2016 (SCAE16).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207