MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002008938 · doi:10.1002/ceat.201100626

Microwave Synthesis of the CPM‐5 Metal Organic Framework

2012· article· en· W2002008938 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering & Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrowaveMaterials scienceCrystallizationMetal-organic frameworkPorosityChemical engineeringMetalMicrowave irradiationSpecific surface areaSolvothermal synthesisNuclear chemistryNanotechnologyChemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistryMetallurgyComposite materialAdsorptionComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The metal organic framework CPM‐5 (crystalline porous materials) was successfully synthesized and characterized for the first time using microwave irradiation as a rapid and facile synthesis method in about 10 min compared to several days crystallization time required for the conventional solvothermal approaches. Furthermore, CPM‐5 produced by microwave‐assisted synthesis exhibited a very high surface area of 2187 m 2 g –1 compared to, e.g., 580 m 2 g –1 of the conventionally synthesized samples. Moreover, the as‐synthesized CPM‐5 showed high carbon dioxide uptake.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it