MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002011430 · doi:10.1144/gsl.sp.2005.252.01.01

The Neuquén Basin: an overview

2005· article· en· W2002011430 on OpenAlexaff
John Howell, Ernesto Schwarz, Luís A. Spalletti, Gonzalo D. Veiga

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyStructural basinPaleontologyEarth science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Neuquén Basin of Argentina and central Chile contains a near-continuous Late Triassic-Early Cenozoic succession deposited on the eastern side of the evolving Andean mountain chain. It is a polyphase basin characterized by three main stages of evolution: initial rift stage; subduction-related thermal sag; and foreland stage. The fill of the basin records the tectonic evolution of the central Andes with dramatic evidence for base-level changes that occurred both within the basin and along its margins. The record of these changes within the mixed siliclastic-carbonate succession makes the basin an excellent field laboratory for sequence stratigraphy and basin evolution. The 4000 m-thick fill of the basin also contains one of the most complete Jurassic-Early Cretaceous marine fossil records, with spectacular finds of both marine and continental vertebrates. The basin is also the most important hydrocarbon-producing province in southern South America, with 280.4 × 10 6 m 3 of oil produced and an estimated 161.9 × 10 6 m 3 remaining. The principal components of the hydrocarbon system (source and reservoir) crop out at the surface close to the fields. The deposits of the basin also serve as excellent analogues to reservoir intervals worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations350
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207