Effects of replacing canola meal as the major protein source with wheat dried distillers grains with solubles on ruminal function, microbial protein synthesis, omasal flow, and milk production in cows
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A study was conducted to determine the effects of replacing canola meal (CM) as the major protein source with wheat-based dried distillers grains with solubles (W-DDGS) on ruminal fermentation, microbial protein production, omasal nutrient flow and animal performance. Eight lactating dairy cows were fed in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design with 28-d periods (20 d of dietary adaptation and 8 d of measurements). Four cows in one Latin square were ruminally cannulated for measurements of ruminal fermentation characteristics and flow of nutrients at the omasal canal. Cows were fed either a standard barley silage-based total mixed ration containing CM as the major protein supplement (0% W-DDGS, control) or diets formulated to contain 10, 15, and 20% W-DDGS (dry matter basis), with W-DDGS replacing primarily CM. Diets were isonitrogenous (18.9% crude protein) and contained 3.0, 3.2, 3.5, and 3.7% ether extract for 0, 10, 15, and 20% W-DDGS, respectively. Diets contained 50% forage and 50% concentrate. Inclusion of W-DDGS linearly increased dry matter intake (29.5, 31.2, 30.2, and 31.9 kg/d for 0, 10, 15, and 20% W-DDGS, respectively). The addition of W-DDGS in place of CM resulted in a 1.2- to 1.8-kg increase in milk yield (42.9, 44.7, 44.1, and 44.5 kg/d for 0, 10, 15, and 20% W-DDGS); however, a quadratic change in feed efficiency (i.e., milk yield/DM intake) occurred as the dietary level of W-DDGS increased. Treatments did not differ for milk fat, protein, and lactose concentrations; however, quadratic changes were observed in milk yields of fat (1.48, 1.56, 1.62, and 1.55 kg/d for 0, 10, 15, and 20% W-DDGS, respectively), protein (1.44, 1.46, 1.49, and 1.42 kg/d) and lactose (1.96, 2.02, 2.09, and 1.93 kg/d). Ruminal fermentation characteristics did not change except that the inclusion of 20% W-DDGS resulted in a decrease and a tendency for a decrease in molar concentrations of isobutyrate and total volatile fatty acids, respectively. Omasal flow of total bacterial nonammonia N (NAN) and bacterial efficiency (g of total bacterial NAN flow/kg of organic matter truly digested in the rumen) were not different among diets; however, feeding W-DDGS resulted in a quadratic increase in nonammonia nonbacterial N flow at the omasal canal (271, 318, 336, and 311 g/d for 0, 10, 15, and 20% W-DDGS, respectively). These data indicate that W-DDGS can substitute for CM as the major protein source in dairy cow diets without negatively affecting ruminal fermentation, microbial protein production, and omasal nutrient flow, and can potentially increase dry matter intake and milk yield.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".