MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002021527 · doi:10.1115/detc2009-87110

Optimization of Twin Tensioner Performance in a Belt-Driven Integrated Starter-Generator System for Micro-Hybrids

2009· article· en· W2002021527 on OpenAlexaff
Adebukola Olsanmi Olatunde, Jean W. Zu

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 6: ASME Power Transmission and Gearing Conference; 3rd International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems; 11th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle and Tire Technologies · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSequential quadratic programmingControl theory (sociology)Tension (geology)Generator (circuit theory)Belt driveEngineeringOptimal designGenetic algorithmParametric statisticsComputationStructural engineeringQuadratic programmingComputer sciencePulleyMathematical optimizationPower (physics)MathematicsAlgorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this paper is to optimize the belt tensioning mechanism, known as the Twin Tensioner. The optimized tensioner achieves the minimum magnitude of belt tension in a Belt-driven Integrated Starter-generator (B-ISG) system. The B-ISG is an emerging hybrid transmission that closely resembles conventional serpentine belt drives. The system contains an integrated starter-generator (ISG) unit that performs a start-stop function on the engine. A derivation of the system’s equation of motion is simulated in this paper. A parametric study evaluates the Twin Tensioner’s parameters with respect to their impact on static tensions. Design variables are selected from these parameters for optimization. The optimization uses the genetic algorithm (GA) and the sequential quadratic programming (SQP) searches. Computations for belt tension based on the optimized design variables indicate the optimal system contains spans with static tensions that are significantly lower in magnitude than in the original design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 6: ASME Power Transmission and Gearing Conference; 3rd International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems; 11th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle and Tire TechnologiesSame topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207