MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002036846 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.120232

Pathogenetic Overview of Psoriatic Disease

2012· review· en· W2002036846 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Muhammad Haroon, Oliver FitzGerald

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Rheumatology Supplement · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDactylitisMedicineEnthesitisPsoriatic arthritisPsoriasisRheumatoid arthritisDiseaseDermatologyPathologySynovitisImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory musculoskeletal disease with both autoimmune and autoinflammatory features. Evidence supports the distinct nature of PsA regarding its clinical, genetic, immunohistochemical, and imaging features. Such features can help to distinguish PsA from other common rheumatic diseases. Apart from peripheral joint involvement, the musculoskeletal lesions in PsA include enthesitis and involvement of the distal interphalangeal joint (frequently associated with nail involvement, dactylitis, and axial involvement). The traditional model of pathogenesis in PsA has identified it as an autoimmune disease; however, an alternative model classifies it as having autoinflammatory features. Similarly, there are important new genetic observations focusing on the HLA region, and genome-wide association that confirms the genetic heterogeneity of patients with psoriasis and patients with PsA. Newer imaging techniques have also provided a much more detailed characterization of tissue abnormalities, in particular highlighting the extent of new bone formation, which is quite distinct from rheumatoid arthritis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Rheumatology SupplementSame topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207