Uncovering the Interrelationships Among Firm Size, Organizational Involvement, Environmental Uncertainty, and Implementation Success
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Using a restaurant industry sample, this study examines the importance of managers' and organizational members' involvement in the implementation of strategy. The study assesses the impact of managers' perception of environmental uncertainty, firm size, and unit type on strategy implementation tactics and level of involvement. Findings indicate that firms operating in an environment of greater uncertainty bring more organizational members into the implementation process. Unit type and size were significant predictors of involvement and success. Larger firms utilized implementation processes that involved more organizational members across the hierarchy. Greater involvement in the implementation process had a consistent positive relationship with implementation success regardless of firm size or perceived environmental uncertainty. The interaction between firm size and dynamism in the environment appears to cause small firm managers to utilize higher involvement methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it