MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002121930 · doi:10.1002/prs.10066

An explosion caused by mixing incompatible liquids

2005· article· en· W2002121930 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcess Safety Progress · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Safety Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogen peroxideForensic engineeringMixing (physics)TruckRoot causeProcess safetyWaste managementEngineeringSulfuric acidRisk analysis (engineering)Environmental scienceOperations managementBusinessChemistryMaterials scienceWork in processMetallurgyAutomotive engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Two workers of a waste handling contractor lost their lives as a result of the explosion of a vacuum truck where they had inadvertently mixed sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide. The consequences of the explosion were simulated and documented. Root causes and contributing factors were identified and, in particular, failure of the management systems are underlined: (1) inadequate procedures, (2) poor training, and (3) poor management controls. Improved procedures, training, and management controls will prevent accidents of this type. © 2005 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog, 2005

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it