MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002135215 · doi:10.1139/v07-133

Interactions among <sup>18</sup>O<sub>2</sub>, C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>, and NO on the surface of stepped Pt(332)

2008· article· en· W2002135215 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Yongfeng Hu, K. Griffiths

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Infrared spectroscopyDesorptionThermal desorption spectroscopyAdsorptionThermal desorptionFourier transform infrared spectroscopyDissociation (chemistry)Spectral lineSpectroscopyAnnealing (glass)Absorption spectroscopyCrystallographyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The influence of co-adsorbed 18O2 (18O) on NO/C2H4 reactions on the surface of stepped Pt(332) has been investigated using Fourier transform infrared reflection–absorption spectroscopy (FTIR-RAS) and thermal desorption spectroscopy (TDS). The presence of 18O2 (18O) results in changes in C2H4 dissociation behavior, with formation of ethylidyne taking place at surface temperature much higher than that in the absence of 18O2 (18O). Pre-annealing 18O2/C2H4 co-adlayers to 250 and 300 K does not lead to significantly different IR spectra, but a variety of spectra are observed when the 250 K and 300 K 18O/C2H4 co-adlayers are further exposed to 0.8 L NO at 90 K, depending on the 18O2 pre-exposure. NO adsorption in bridge sites, both on steps and on terraces is more significantly suppressed for the co-adlayers in which 18O2/C2H4 is pre-annealed to 250 K. This site-blocking effect is enhanced with increasing 18O2 exposure. However, no new surface species, which are intermediates for N2 production, are detected. Thermal desorption spectra indicate that various species are produced, but only N2 and H2 desorption have intensities that can be reliably analyzed (that is to be able to quantitatively elucidate how the yields of these two species vary with change in the ratios of NO to C2H4 and 18O2). Desorption of both N2 and H2 is more strongly dependent on 18O2 exposure than on the temperature to which 18O2/C2H4 adlayers are pre-annealed. The presence of 18O2, irrespective of the dosing sequence, suppresses N2 desorption, but this effect is much weaker when 18O2 is post-dosed. For the case with 18O2 pre-dosed, irrespective of the annealing temperature (250 K or 300 K), N2 desorption is greatly suppressed at an 18O2 exposure of 0.2 L, but thereafter remains almost unchanged with increasing 18O2 exposure from 0.4 to 1.6 L. This feature of N2 desorption is explained by the restoration of the adsorption of NO onto steps and the subsequent NO dissociation on these sites. In contrast, H2 desorption decreases continuously and disappears at 0.8 L 18O2 and higher. It is concluded that the presence of 18O2 in the reaction of NO with C2H4 on the surface of Pt(332) does not play any role of activating the surface reactants.Key words: NO, platinum, C2H4, deNOx, hydrocarbon, selective catalytic reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207