Les nouvelles relations transatlantiques en matière de défense: Quelle rôle pour le Canada?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La consolidation de la Politique européenne de sécurité et de défense (PESD) entraîne une reconfiguration des relations transatlantiques en matière de défense, désormais appréhendées sous l'angle d'un rapport direct entre les États‐Unis et l'Union européenne. Cet article s'intéresse aux conséquences pour le Canada de sa marginalisation en matière de défense. La PESD y est décrite comme un champ organisationnel avec un nouvel ensemble d'acteurs, de règles et de représentations sociales. On y montre que le Canada a du mal à trouver sa place dans cet espace producteur de politiques de sécurité, qui n'est ni celui d'un État souverain, ni celui d'une organisation internationale traditionnelle comme l'OTAN. La solution passe par un engagement concret et pragmatique au sein même du champ de la défense européenne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".