Permeability, Selectivity, and Testing of Hydrogen Diffusion Membranes Suitable for Use in Steam Reforming
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three composite hydrogen-permeable membranes were produced by the electroless deposition of palladium on macroporous Inconel. The permeability and selectivity for hydrogen to argon was assessed over the range 750−850 °C using a 156-μm-thick membrane. The permeability coefficient was 1.874 × 10 -6 mol/(m s kPa 0.5 ), with an activation energy of 22.6 kJ/mol. Membranes produced by the electroless technique exhibited hydrogen/argon molar selectivities in the range (336−1187):1. Two membranes were used to assess the effect of hydrogen permeation on the conversion of methane over a 20 wt % Ni/α-alumina catalyst in a CREC riser simulator used to model a fast fluidized bed. Hydrogen permeation from the reactor produced conversions in excess of those attainable at equilibrium and favorably modified the composition of the synthesis gas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".