Lipid‐induced colonic hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome: the role of 5‐HT<sub>3</sub> receptors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome patients demonstrate colonic hypersensitivity after duodenal lipid infusion. AIM: To investigate the role of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) receptors in this sensory component of the gastrocolonic response in irritable bowel syndrome. METHODS: Fifteen female patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome completed a trial with the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist alosetron (1 mg b.d.) or placebo (b.d.) over 15 days, followed by the alternative treatment. Each treatment period was followed by a colonic distension trial before and after duodenal lipids. Changes in colonic thresholds, tone and compliance and viscerosomatic referral pattern after lipids were compared between treatments. RESULTS: With placebo, the colonic thresholds after lipids were significantly reduced for all studied sensations, whereas, with alosetron, the thresholds were significantly reduced only for first sensation and discomfort, but not for gas and pain. The reductions in thresholds did not differ significantly between treatments, but the pain threshold after alosetron tended to be less reduced compared with placebo (P = 0.10). The effects of lipids on tone, compliance and viscerosomatic referral pattern were unaffected by alosetron relative to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: 5-HT3 receptor antagonism reduces the lipid-induced colonic hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome. However, 5-HT3 receptors do not seem to be the principal mediator, but may be a cofactor for the exaggerated sensory component of the gastrocolonic response in irritable bowel syndrome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".