MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002210139 · doi:10.7202/201023ar

De l’Éden à Babel : écrire l’utopie

2006· article· fr· W2002210139 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Claudine Potvin

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsOkanagan College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude de Babel, prise deux propose un regard sur le mythe de babel et sur la figure d'utopie à partir des concepts de territorialité et de frontière, lieu utopique par excellence dans le roman. Lieu de rupture, de coupure ou de rencontre; lieu de séduction et de désirs aussi. L'héroïne construit et s'approprie le territoire privé et collectif (de la langue à la cité en passant par l'information et l'ethnicité) et l'investit d'une vision «anti-utopique » qui renverse les fictions d'incomplétude, d'inaptitude et d'uniformité que symbolise la tour inachevée ou démolie. En fait, cette lecture du roman suggère précisément que le texte cherche à inscrire la différence, ce qu'il réussit en partie, mais ce, à l'intérieur d'un discours intimiste et donc partiellement bloqué.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix et ImagesSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207