Retour sur une (d)ébauche : Une problématique communicationnelle du changement technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Je revisite ici mon papier paru en 1993 dans Technologie de l’Information et Société sous le titre « Diffusionnisme, constructivisme et modèle technique : ébauche d'une approche communicationnelle du changement technico-social ». Je commence par envisager de nouveau les conditions de possibilité d’une synthèse de la théorie de la diffusion des innovations avec les théories (constructivistes) de la genèse des objets techniques, avant de revenir sur les critiques et apories propres à l’une de ces dernières, la théorie de l’acteur-réseau. Plus qu’à une résolution de ces problèmes, j’insiste au contraire sur quelques pistes problématiques, en espérant que certaines apories théories, plutôt qu’obstacles à, peuvent devenir moteur de, la réflexion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".