MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002257190 · doi:10.1149/1.1738133

An Intermediate-Temperature Ammonia Fuel Cell Using Gd-Doped Barium Cerate Electrolyte

2004· article· en· W2002257190 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew McFarlan, Luc G. Pelletier, N. Maffei

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsElectrolyteAmmoniaInorganic chemistryHydrogenAnodeAmmonia productionDirect-ethanol fuel cellElectrochemistryMaterials scienceProton exchange membrane fuel cellHydrogen fuelChemistryCatalysisChemical engineeringElectrodeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An intermediate-temperature solid electrolyte fuel cell has been developed that employs a proton-conducting solid electrolyte and uses ammonia directly as the hydrogen-containing fuel. Preliminary tests demonstrate that Gd-doped barium cerate is a suitable electrolyte material for a direct ammonia fuel cell operating at intermediate temperatures. When ammonia was fed directly at 700°C, a pressed electrolyte wafer with a supported platinum anode catalyst produced 50 mW power at 100 mA current. Fuel cell performance using ammonia was only marginally lower compared to pure hydrogen, and this was attributed to production of nitrogen during the ammonia cracking which dilutes the hydrogen fuel. Complete conversion of ammonia to hydrogen is possible due to the fuel cell's ability to continuously remove hydrogen from the anode chamber, as well as supply the necessary heat for the ammonia cracking reaction. Nitrogen and water are the only chemical products of the direct ammonia fuel cell utilizing a proton-conducting solid electrolyte. © 2004 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207