MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002262217 · doi:10.5539/ijc.v6n4p12

An Anomalous Hammett Correlation for a Series of Substituted 3-Benzyl-2-phenyl-1,3-thiazolidin-4-ones

2014· article· en· W2002262217 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniel McGarity, John Tierney, Anthony F. Lagalante

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemistry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicStructural and Chemical Analysis of Organic and Inorganic Compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubstituentChemistryHammett equationChemical shiftRing (chemistry)Series (stratigraphy)Carbon fibersStereochemistryMedicinal chemistryReaction rate constantOrganic chemistryKineticsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of 3-benzyl-2-phenyl-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one derivatives, with substituents at the N-benzyl site, was synthesized and characterized. Excluding the p-MeO and m-Br derivatives, distinct correlations between Hammett constant ? and 13C substituent chemical shifts were observed in the C2, C4, and C5 carbons in the thiazolidin-4-one ring. This was unexpected because the transmission of substituent effects appears to be occurring via the sp3 hybridized N-benzyl carbon. No discernible correlation was seen for the N-benzyl carbon; the carbon through which the effects were occurring. Correlations for substituent chemical shifts to Swain Lupton substituent parameters r and f constants were also attempted. Similar to the Hammett correlations, C2, C4, and C5 showed a reasonable degree of correlation with minimal to no improvement over Hammett constants; similarly, as with the Hammett correlations, the benzyl carbon exhibited no correlation with Swain Lupton parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ChemistrySame topicStructural and Chemical Analysis of Organic and Inorganic CompoundsFrench-language works237,207