The efficacy of fluoxetine in improving physical symptoms associated with premenstrual dysphoric disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of fluoxetine in alleviating physical symptoms of premenstrual dysphoric disorder. DESIGN: Randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel study. SETTING: Canadian University based outpatient clinics. Participants Four hundred and five subjects, of whom 320 with prospectively determined premenstrual dysphoric disorder were randomised. METHODS: Randomised women were assigned to fluoxetine 20 or 60 mg/day or placebo. Common physical symptoms associated with premenstrual dysphoric disorder including breast tenderness, bloating, and headache were evaluated by visual analog scales and the self-rated and observer premenstrual tension syndrome scales. OUTCOME MEASURES: Luteal phase change from mean baseline scores to mean treatment scores for all scales. RESULTS: Fluoxetine treatment was statistically superior to placebo, with no significant differences between the two fluoxetine dosages in their effects on physical symptoms. CONCLUSION: Daily fluoxetine treatment is superior to placebo in improving the most common physical symptoms associated with premenstrual dysphoric disorder.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".