MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002283259 · doi:10.3917/docsi.462.0030

Un métier en devenir

2009· article· fr· W2002283259 on OpenAlexaff
Sylvie Dessolin-Baumann, Caroline Wiegandt

Bibliographic record

VenueDocumentaliste-Sciences de l Information · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Transports
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesDocumentationArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé En une douzaine d’années, le records management « à la française » a creusé son sillon. Mise au point de normes, réflexion sur la valorisation des métiers de l’information-documentation, partage des pratiques : le RM s’est élevé au rang d’une discipline à part entière qui a ses professionnels, sa stratégie, ses processus et ses outils. Dans ce dossier en trois temps, Sylvie Dessolin-Baumann et Caroline Wiegandt rappellent les enjeux et fixent les repères de la « gestion de l’information et des documents ».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0060.042
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDocumentaliste-Sciences de l InformationSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207